<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WINE 1.1.24 &#8211; Lastest build tested.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://openbytes.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/wine-1-1-24-lastest-build-tested/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://openbytes.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/wine-1-1-24-lastest-build-tested/</link>
	<description>Celebrating FOSS, exposing FUD!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 21:07:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: xD</title>
		<link>http://openbytes.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/wine-1-1-24-lastest-build-tested/#comment-1394</link>
		<dc:creator>xD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openbytes.wordpress.com/?p=1667#comment-1394</guid>
		<description>Sry I thought that I put my real name when I thought I had double posted</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sry I thought that I put my real name when I thought I had double posted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xD</title>
		<link>http://openbytes.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/wine-1-1-24-lastest-build-tested/#comment-1393</link>
		<dc:creator>xD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openbytes.wordpress.com/?p=1667#comment-1393</guid>
		<description>Microsoft also censored  proof from Cambridge university that Xen as being better than virtual pc.
Apparently you can make it illegal for others to defame ur product
(I am very bad at concealing my identity)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft also censored  proof from Cambridge university that Xen as being better than virtual pc.<br />
Apparently you can make it illegal for others to defame ur product<br />
(I am very bad at concealing my identity)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 29/06/2009: Core Linux 2.1 Released; FreeDOS is Now 15 &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://openbytes.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/wine-1-1-24-lastest-build-tested/#comment-1318</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 29/06/2009: Core Linux 2.1 Released; FreeDOS is Now 15 &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openbytes.wordpress.com/?p=1667#comment-1318</guid>
		<description>[...] WINE 1.1.24 – Lastest build tested. The Wine project has been going for a long time. Users who want to upgrade their OS to Windows 7 and like the idea of XP mode, should note that firstly XP mode is available only in the more expensive versions (apparently) and it allegedly does not offer DirectX support. Wine on the other hand has great support for software (check the home page for your favorite title) it won’t cost you anything, and its worth considering to try if as an unhappy Vista customer you are looking for an upgrade to your OS. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WINE 1.1.24 – Lastest build tested. The Wine project has been going for a long time. Users who want to upgrade their OS to Windows 7 and like the idea of XP mode, should note that firstly XP mode is available only in the more expensive versions (apparently) and it allegedly does not offer DirectX support. Wine on the other hand has great support for software (check the home page for your favorite title) it won’t cost you anything, and its worth considering to try if as an unhappy Vista customer you are looking for an upgrade to your OS. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s5h.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; XP Applications Run Better in GNU/Linux Than in Vista/Vista 7?</title>
		<link>http://openbytes.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/wine-1-1-24-lastest-build-tested/#comment-1316</link>
		<dc:creator>s5h.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; XP Applications Run Better in GNU/Linux Than in Vista/Vista 7?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openbytes.wordpress.com/?p=1667#comment-1316</guid>
		<description>[...] http://openbytes.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/wine-1-1-24-lastest-build-tested/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://openbytes.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/wine-1-1-24-lastest-build-tested/" rel="nofollow">http://openbytes.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/wine-1-1-24-lastest-build-tested/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: openbytes</title>
		<link>http://openbytes.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/wine-1-1-24-lastest-build-tested/#comment-1304</link>
		<dc:creator>openbytes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 22:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openbytes.wordpress.com/?p=1667#comment-1304</guid>
		<description>Thanks for reminding me Will....

I&#039;m not sure of its value to the home user if it doesnt have DX support and since I&#039;d guess (what with the amount of diverse software on the net) they would be the ones most in need of the XP mode.  Its pretty academic anyway since theres no reason if someone really wants XP mode that can&#039;t just dual boot a Linux/wine build.  It would certainly save money and give them DX compat.

Thanks for the links.  Very interesting.
Regards,
Goblin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for reminding me Will&#8230;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure of its value to the home user if it doesnt have DX support and since I&#8217;d guess (what with the amount of diverse software on the net) they would be the ones most in need of the XP mode.  Its pretty academic anyway since theres no reason if someone really wants XP mode that can&#8217;t just dual boot a Linux/wine build.  It would certainly save money and give them DX compat.</p>
<p>Thanks for the links.  Very interesting.<br />
Regards,<br />
Goblin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://openbytes.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/wine-1-1-24-lastest-build-tested/#comment-1303</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 22:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openbytes.wordpress.com/?p=1667#comment-1303</guid>
		<description>One further thing to keep in mind is that XP Mode will require processors that support hardware level virtualization. Some processors do, some don&#039;t. Here is some info about that for the benefit of readers concerning Intel and AMD chips:

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/windows-xp-mode-virtualization-intel,7709.html

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-cpu-windows-xp-mode,7739.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One further thing to keep in mind is that XP Mode will require processors that support hardware level virtualization. Some processors do, some don&#8217;t. Here is some info about that for the benefit of readers concerning Intel and AMD chips:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/windows-xp-mode-virtualization-intel,7709.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.tomshardware.com/news/windows-xp-mode-virtualization-intel,7709.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-cpu-windows-xp-mode,7739.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-cpu-windows-xp-mode,7739.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
